Props, Provocation and Pop Quizzes: Emotionally Stunted Tools of Genocidal Buffoons

Zionist Communication

Disgraceful UN Displays

The mass walk out of UN delegates began before “Netanyahu” even addressed the audience with the bizarre mix of defiant aggression, paranoid accusation and puerile gimmickry that befits the “leader” of a sham state.

His stock genocidal phrases: “We’re not done yet” and “Israel must finish the job” were said to be broadcasted on loudspeakers along the “Israel”-Gaza border for the benefit of the “brave soldiers” dressing in ladies’ underwear, targeting children and posting clips of barbeques, dancing and revelry held against a backdrop of Gaza burning with explosions; and for the benefit of the “Israeli” hostages that he has thrown to the mercy of the indiscriminate bombing and starvation he has ordered.

Cowardly indeed is the creature who repeatedly threatens and inflicts “collective punishment”, killing at a distance and AI warfare rather than the fair fighting; they said Hamas were the cowards and yet they are the ones who use cowardly tactics, the sick tools of Jewish supremacy.

With the usual brazen lack of self-awareness that is a hallmark of all Zionists, he called the recognition of Palestine a “mark of shame” while exhibiting the shamelessness that is second nature to psychopaths with their puny emotional development; as well as the term “savage terrorists” to describe those in agreement with recognizing Palestine – that is 157 out of 193 UN member states.

Show these people their reflection in a mirror and they will just turn it outwards into accusatory finger pointing and deflection; no guilt touches them and no self-examination troubles them, so entrenched are they in their firm conviction that they can do no wrong by virtue of who they are – they are better, superior and installed at the top of a hierarchy of humanity where they don’t need to submit to the rules others do.

This sense of impunity and immunity is a trait of all those who regard themselves above what they perceive to be the “petty rules” of ordinary humans, and it characterizes the upper tiers of all discriminatory systems from the Hindu caste system to any form of apartheid but particularly that based on religious supremacy; indeed, it is by now evident that “Israelis” regard themselves as the crème de la crème of a worldwide hierarchical order.

The objective reality may be that “Israel” is recognized by the majority of the world as a rogue state, Netanyahu as a deranged war criminal whose constant accusations of anti-semitism, “blood libel” and bias against “Israel” are odious, petulant and tiring, and the settlers and IOF as the scum of the earth; but objective reality is not what “Israel” deals in, in its projective, paranoid and poisonous little sham existence.

Instead, “Israel” and Zionism, with the help of the US, rewrite reality and redraw the maps of the Middle East; they twist semantics, distort every term into its opposite and throw out an inverted topography of the actual order of things, all bizarrely illustrated by a series of tacky props that speak more to their disturbed state of mind than to any credibility or qualities of truth. If you wanted people to form the worst possible opinion of you, this is how you would present yourself.

He proceeded with a malevolent display of props, visual aids and pop quizzes along the lines of: “which country has repeatedly attacked “the USA?” style questions - which some news publications refer to as “showmanship” when a “Western” leader does it, rather than acknowledging these are tools of those who are too stupid, lazy and crude to make their point intelligently. Hence, they are favoured by Zionists.

A deranged display of racism, bigotry and paranoia delusion - all propped up by flimsy gimmicks

Zionism’s Angry Desperation

The Oxford Union debate on whether “Israel” is conducting a genocide, with Susan Abulhawa and Mohammed El-Kurd on the Palestinian side and Yoseph Haddad and Mosab Hasan Yousef on the “Israeli” side, was a case in point.

While Abulhawa and El-Kurd invoked natural eloquence and the tempered tones of people who have been subject to long standing oppression, the type that forces you to hone your qualities so that you can present truths with clarity and economy, and who have learned deep-seated patience along with the wisdom of years of internalized lessons - Haddad and Yousef relied on props, gimmicks and shouting at the audience – in fact, terrorizing them.

While Yousef ironically accused the audience of being “terrorists” when they didn’t agree with him, and then shouting at them, waving around posters and invoking the oh so tired claims of “jew hatred” (no one cares anymore, that card died a death when you killed over 100,000 children so you better stop saying “blood libel” because that is actually what it looks like) - Haddad, who also used multiple props and posters in his “speech” as well as a T shirt of the slain Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, was removed from the chamber for his rowdy and provocative behaviour.

The debate concluded with the majority agreeing that “Israel is an apartheid state responsible for genocide” – a motion that resulted in attacks by several right-wing newspapers and American “think tanks”, the latter masquerading as the voice of reason and Western liberal values by including the misleading word “democracy” in their names.

What is astounding though, is how the rational, liberal and measured discourse supposedly promoted by the West has become merely a series of empty epithets when applied to “Israel” and indeed the US, both countries that pride themselves on their Western political values and “humanity” and enjoy pointing to other countries of the global south as “barbaric” and backward.

The public “discourse” of “Israel” is almost without exception characterized by screaming in a frenzied rage, shouting over your opponent and using visual props as if lecturing an audience of illiterates or hard of hearing. This is not showmanship – it is vulgarity of the first order.

The excessive over-reliance on cheap tricks and shock tactics, gameshow host style speech and props, is an indication of the emotionally stunted nature of Zionists and how they substitute gimmicks for eloquence, artifice for real thought and vulgar little contrivances for actual reasoning and rhetoric.

“Never Again” and The Sham of International Law

These types of tactics are the tools of propaganda; posters, tacky flip charts and T shirts emblazoned with slogans instead of being able to articulate ones point in a fair and reasoned discussion.

And why is this a surprise? “Israel” is itself a cheap, artificial gimmick that masquerades as a country, a military outpost teeming with deviants and sex offenders, covered over with a veneer of borrowed identity stolen from other, more authentic sources such as the Middle Eastern countries surrounding them and that they pronounce themselves the only democracy within.

Although “Israel” is constantly at pains to point out that it is the only Western democracy in the Middle East we now see that its human rights abuses transcend those of any of the tyrannical regimes around it, it’s just that those abuses are inflicted on people that the West sees as less than human.

In this way “Israel” leverages its special colonial relationship with the West, where both are in collusion with respect to their actual values of white superiority and the dehumanization of those from the global south, in order to create parallels in terms of identity.

But just as “Israel’s” identity is a sham and indeed an insult to any pretence at real, humanist values, the Wests mask has also fallen, and its own pretence at being a bastion of liberal humanist enlightenment values has crumbled; its system of legality and international frameworks ostensibly constructed to institute order and fairness, have proven ineffectual screens for safeguarding its own privileges and have been dispensed with the moment they could have proven to be useful.

Two years of charades, resolutions, negotiations and veto’s have proven that there is no internationally agreed upon and effective statute to safeguard the rights of people who are being massacred in the 21^st century genocide, the Gaza holocaust – and that there is no body that will credibly challenge it; it falls to the people, such as those of Italy and Spain; and to the odd leader of courage like Gustavo Petro, to challenge this dead and defunct system and to rise against injustice; in the process we can only hope that there is the glimpse of a new world order, and the beginning of instituting a real system of justice.

They said “never again” – and they continue to thrust this pointless phrase on us; but by now, we know that “never again” meant only for their own “friends” and allies.

Free Palestine 🇵🇸