Shifting Currents, Breaking Narratives and the Great Anti-Semitism Hoax

The End of Impunity and the Beginning of Accountability

Recent Political Developments

You will have noticed that there has been a shift of late. Last week Trump decided to snub “Israeli” PM “Netanyahu” – rather than making his Middle East visit revolve around “Israel”, as has been the custom for countless US Presidents, Trump instead, chose to cut him out altogether.

This came on the heels of his recent radical foreign policy moves regarding the Middle East, not least of which was his 6^th May announcement of a “truce” with the Yemeni Houthi’s who agreed to stop targeting US (and not “Israeli”) vessels which has left “Israel” feeling distinctly rattled.

Combined with his recent deal with Hamas to free the last living US “Israeli” hostage Edan Alexander, and other significant moves like the lifting of sanctions on Syria, and going back a few months, the March meeting of special envoy for hostage affairs Adam Boehler’s meeting with Hamas with accompanying statement that: “Hamas members don’t have horns growing out of their heads - they’re actually men like us, kind men" - and we have some unprecedented moves that have upset pro-“Israel” lawmakers and left “Israel” feeling somewhat “out in the cold”.

Trump has also challenged the dominant Western position on Ukraine, intervened in the recent Kashmir crisis, risking antagonizing India, and endorsed negotiations with Iran over their nuclear programme, as well as selling billions worth of arms to the Saudi’s.

Maybe Trump got so fed up of pulling out “Netanyahu’s” chair, that he decided to pull out the rug from under his feet instead.

As we speak, Trump is reportedly engaged in direct peace talks with Hamas, while “Netanyahu” along with his right wing coalition, who are increasingly isolated in their position with respect to Gaza, have massively stepped up their genocidal campaign as of the last 3 days (albeit carried out largely with US made bombs).

Breaking the Narratives: Politicians and the Institutions

To be clear: Trump could not care less about the plight of the Palestinians – his January 30^th executive order to “combat anti-semitism” – i.e. to stamp out any anti-genocide dissent on US campuses, has resulted in draconian measures including the kidnapping and deportation of anybody seen to speak out against “Israel’s” genocidal campaign in Gaza.

He described his aim of being “the best friend Jewish Americans have ever had in the White House”, as well accepting 100 million from Miriam Adelson in exchange for the West Bank .

However, although Trumps supposed “distancing” with “Israel”, may well have some truth to it, Trump has revealed himself as somebody who will do a deal with anybody in order to boost his own ego and line his pockets; but within his seemingly erratic choices, there is at least one positive, even if it has come too late – and this is his inability to obey dominant narratives.

By breaking out of the expected roles - not least, the ingratiating deference displayed by every president towards “Israel” and AIPAC - Trump has managed to rapidly dispense with disingenuous tropes and puncture some of the hitherto very entrenched, manipulative narratives that served the “Israel” lobby, Zionists around the world and ethno-supremacist Jews everywhere.

In negotiating with Hamas and the Houthi’s, Trump has single-handedly unravelled all of those narratives - the unspoken injunctions we have in place that we are never allowed to question, and that are the hallmark of liberal left thought policing, that people then allow to dictate their own thinking and behaviours.

Hence the floodgate opening for the press, media and even a smattering of politicans, on both sides of the Atlantic, to voice some truths about the genocide in Gaza, that have been a long time coming.

On May 6^th, came the Financial Times editorial piece on: “The West’s shameful Silence on Gaza” – the FT is a traditionally centre-right newspaper; other publications followed suit, from the Economist to the weekend editorials from the likes of the Guardian and Independent – all calling for an end to the war on Gaza, the suffering of the Palestinians and even the complicity of our PM Kier Starmer. Also joining this choris was Tom Fletcher UN humanitarian affairs chief on BBC radio who used the word “genocide” albeit framed within a question.

Conservative MP Mark Pritchard spoke out on how his support for “Israel” has now turned to condemnation, admitting that he “got it wrong” and Democrat Senator Chris Van Hollen referred to “ethnic cleansing”.

Scores of cowardly sheep (amongst these probably other FT, Guardian, Independent journalists), thus far afraid to even say the word “Israel” without also gabbling about Hamas and October 7^th, anti-semitism and ““Israel’s” right to defend itself” for fear of feeling socially awkward, risking their jobs, or just because they are plain stupid/racist/Zionists (take your pick) are now left scratching their heads – or feeling worried (not about a genocide, but about being seen to have been supporting one).

In negotiating with Hamas and the Houthi’s – who were thus far painted as twin terrorist entities, a picture that could on no account be questioned – Trump managed to humanize them - and thus give implicit permission to other institutional voices to do the same.

As much as I may personally dislike Trump - a grandiose malignant narcissist if ever there was one - his blend of boldness and radical self-centred disregard for convention and “rules” means that, like some expert narcissists, he is a disruptor of narratives. This is very important in a time where narratives sustain the thought policing sheep herding approach of the liberal left.

All these developments, albeit late in the day, have signalled a shift in the general current, a slow but sure turning of the tide of public opinion, a litmus change that begins at the top of institutions and then filters down to the unquestioning masses who had hitherto thought they are not allowed to criticize “Israel”, the blind hoardes who will be momentarily disoriented by the shift.

Handpainted plates by Gazan refugee children, removed from a hospital wall for making some “Jewish patients” feel “vulnerable and victimised” - removed thanks to Jewish Lawyers for “Israel”

The Anti-semitism Hoax

All of this has prompted a huge panic among certain institutions and groups of people. Radical extremist Jewish groups who have continued to support the bombing in Gaza, the slaughter and brutalisation of civilians - are now panicking; not about dead Gazan children, but about the fact that their impunity may be coming to an end.

“Responses to anti-semitism are shifting – this should concern us” reports Daniel Sugar in the Jewish News – before going on to turn all criticisms of “Israel’s” conduct on their head through inversions like this: “An individual makes a comment which is considered by a Jewish person to be antisemitic and is called out as such. The person who made the original comment attacks the Jewish person for calling this out, accusing them of falsely labelling the comment as antisemitic as part of a concentrated effort to stifle any criticism of Israel.”

To unpick this, ““An individual makes a comment which is considered by a Jewish person to be antisemitic and is called out as such…” really means: an individual criticises “Israel” and it’s conduct, uses words like “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” - and is shut down with false accusations of the universal silencing mechanism of choice for Zionists: accusations of “anti-semitism”.

As we know, many of us have been subject to the above dynamic.

Let us be clear: they are afraid that this could mean the beginning not of anti-semitism - but of accountability; and the end of impunity.

It would signal that people are starting to see things for what they are – yes, they needed the permission of politicians and newspapers, they needed to be allowed to have the scales fall from their eyes – but they can see now.

Time and again, they were warned that if you keep invoking “anti-semitism” at every turn, people will start to associate Jewish people with what is happening in “Israel”, and that their unfettered support for the rabid “Israeli” politicians who invoke the Jewish religion to commit all manner of atrocities will associate them as such.

That behaving in certain ways, such as disrupting peaceful protests with stupid facile requests to cross a road and prove a petty point will draw peoples ire and contempt.

“Israel’s” actions no matter how genocidal, are supported by the majority of Jews worldwide (although by no means all of them), but the Jews who have honest agenda’s are not troubled by people protesting against a genocide, they join in the voices of humanity, they don’t cry “anti-semitism”.

It is the Jews who invoke anti-semitism at every turn and use this as a cover-all excuse, who try to silence people through this accusation, that are now worried. It is precisely the Jews who have been weaponizing anti-semitism, that are now so concerned about the change in the tide of public opinion, because it is those Jews who still support the genocide that is happening in Gaza.

Nefarious organizations like the Henry Jackson society who have been pushing an anti-Muslim agenda for years to help “justify” the actions of “Israel” in the MiddleEast and the aggressive ADL who have used anti-semitism as a hammer to bludgeon everybody with, and blackmail all who dare to criticize “Israel”, who support ethnic cleansing and genocide but have enjoyed special status and impunity for decades – should be open to scrutiny.

The abhorrent Lawyers for “Israel” - who have undertaken actions such as having plates hand painted by Gazan refugee children removed from the wall of Chelsea and Westminster hospital because Jewish patients “said they felt vulnerable and victimized” by this display, need to be exposed as what they are, another aggressive machine to silence any criticism of “Israel”.

The accusation of “Anti-semitism” should be no more powerful than any accusation of racism. Every single prejudice against a group should be treated the same, and if people can make comments about one religion they should be equally free to do so about another. Western governments should no longer be held hostage to definitions of “anti-semitism” and invocations of the Holocaust in order to justify another, even worse Holocaust.

Nobody – absolutely nobody - should enjoy a special, exempt status – because this is what leads to the kind of thing that we are witnessing today. A narcissistic, exempt, special victim status – that allows people to kill with impunity and to inflict the worst and most sadistic behaviours on another people while shielded from the consequences of their own actions. It is time for this madness to end.